R. Brimley Johnson's The Women Novelists (1918) opens by asserting that before the late eighteenth century, women writers 'copied men, and saw through men’s eyes,' producing no 'peculiarly feminine elements.' Johnson then proposes a century-long arc—from Burney's Evelina (1778) to George Eliot's Daniel Deronda (1876)—during which women 'found themselves' in fiction. The study is structured around close readings of diction, dialogue, and descriptive choices, treating each novelist's style as evidence of a developing feminine literary tradition.

Burney's 'Picture of Youth' and the Language of Social Observation

Johnson devotes two chapters to Fanny Burney, calling Evelina 'a picture of youth' and emphasizing her use of dialogue to capture social nuance. He notes that Burney's characters reveal themselves through 'the smallest detail of parochial gossip,' a method Johnson contrasts with later novelists. In Cranford, he draws a parallel: Mrs. Gaskell's 'methods of portraiture more nearly resemble Miss Austen’s,' yet Burney's influence persists in the attention to 'fragments and small opportunities'—rose-leaves gathered for pot-pourri, lavender sent to town-dwellers. Johnson argues that such details are not mere decoration but 'a powerful incentive to Christian practices,' grounding moral observation in concrete, domestic action.

Austen's Economy and the 'Study in Fine Art'

Johnson's chapter on Jane Austen is titled 'A Study in Fine Art,' and he examines her narrative economy through the lens of diction. He observes that Austen 'depends, even less, upon excitement, mystery, or crime' than her predecessors, and that her characters are 'equally living' despite the absence of conventional plot. Johnson highlights Austen's use of indirect discourse and understatement, noting that she 'has less wit, but almost as much humour' as Burney. The analysis of Emma and Persuasion focuses on how Austen's descriptive choices—such as the 'green turban' of Miss Matty's dream in Cranford—reveal character through seemingly trivial objects. Johnson insists that Austen's art lies in 'the creation of an atmosphere' rather than dramatic incident.

Brontë's 'Lonely Soul' and the Voice of Passion

The chapter on Charlotte Brontë, titled 'A Lonely Soul,' examines her distinctive first-person narration and emotional intensity. Johnson points to Brontë's use of 'passionate' dialogue and 'impassioned' description, which he contrasts with Austen's restraint. He notes that Brontë's heroines speak in a voice that is 'frankly feminine' yet 'not superior to the smallest detail,' a phrase he also applies to Mrs. Gaskell. Johnson traces how Brontë's diction—words like 'lonely,' 'soul,' and 'agony'—creates a 'psychological realism' that marks a departure from earlier conventions. He cautions that the excerpts do not reveal the full arc of Brontë's development, but the emphasis on interiority is unmistakable.

George Eliot's 'Professional Woman' and the Shift to Intellectual Diction

Johnson's final major chapter, 'A Professional Woman,' addresses George Eliot's transition from provincial tales to philosophical novels. He observes that Eliot's diction becomes increasingly 'abstract' and 'analytical,' reflecting her engagement with scientific and social theory. Johnson notes that Eliot's dialogue often carries 'the weight of argument,' a shift from the 'gossip' of Burney and Austen. He compares Eliot's descriptive method to that of Mrs. Gaskell, but finds Eliot 'more deliberate' in her use of metaphor. The chapter concludes with a discussion of 'The Woman’s Man'—an ideal male figure in women's fiction—and Johnson suggests that Eliot's male characters are 'more fully realized' than those of her predecessors, though the excerpts do not permit a full assessment of this claim.

Johnson's study is valuable for its attention to the craft of fiction—how word choice, dialogue patterns, and descriptive habits define an author's voice. Readers interested in the evolution of narrative technique will find precise observations on Burney's social ear, Austen's economy, Brontë's passion, and Eliot's intellectual reach. The book rewards those who read with an eye for stylistic detail rather than plot summary.